When Washington’s Equal Pay and Opportunities Act (EPOA) was updated in 2023, it felt like progress. For the first time, job seekers had the right to know what a position paid before they applied. Employers were now legally required to post salary ranges and benefits information in job listings, which was a huge step toward fair wages and pay transparency across the state.
But that win for workers didn’t go unchallenged. And the story of how those protections are being quietly scaled back begins with a major retailer and a court case that’s captured statewide attention.
The Case That Changed the Conversation
In early 2024, Total Wine & More — through its Washington-based subsidiary, Washington Fine Wine & Spirits — became the center of a legal battle. Plaintiffs-Appellants Lisa Branson and Cherie Burke, represented by Emery | Reddy, argued the company violated the updated EPOA by failing to include wage and benefits information in its listings.
Rather than update its listings, Total Wine pushed back. The company didn’t just fight the claim in court, it argued that the plaintiff wasn’t a “bona fide” job applicant, and therefore couldn’t sue. According to Total Wine, if someone applied to a job solely to check whether it complied with the law, their lawsuit should be dismissed.
But the story doesn’t stop there.
A New Law Changes the Rules
While the case worked its way through the courts, something unexpected happened. A new bill, SB 5408, quietly made its way through the Washington legislature. The law, which passed unanimously in spring 2025, dramatically limits workers’ ability to bring claims for pay transparency violations.
Now, before a job seeker can take legal action, they must first notify the employer and give them five business days to fix the mistake. Employers can avoid penalties simply by correcting the posting, even if they initially broke the law. The bill also caps damages, reducing what workers can recover for each violation.
Supporters say the law prevents unnecessary lawsuits. But critics believe it weakens one of the strongest wage transparency laws in the country. In effect, it gives companies like Total Wine the ability to make mistakes without facing real consequences, as long as they fix them after being caught.
Why Pay Transparency Matters for Washington State Workers
For job seekers in Washington, this shift is significant. Before SB 5408, hundreds of wage transparency lawsuits had been filed holding employers accountable for illegal job postings. These cases not only sought justice for individual applicants but also encouraged widespread compliance with the law.
Now, with the new correction period and damage caps in place, employers can sidestep full accountability if they move quickly and workers who aren’t aware of their rights may never know that they were shortchanged in the first place.
Know Your Rights. Take Action.
If you applied to a job in Washington state after January 1, 2023, and the listing didn’t include pay or benefits information, you may still have a case — especially if the employer failed to correct the posting within the required timeframe.
Emery | Reddy is continuing to fight for workers affected by wage secrecy and EPOA violations. If you’ve seen a job posting that didn’t comply with the law, or if you’re unsure whether your rights were violated, we’re here to help. Our legal team can review your claim, explain your options, and advocate for the compensation you may be owed.
Here’s what you should do:
Save a screenshot of the original job posting
Keep all communications with the employer
Contact an experienced Employment Law attorneyto review whether your case still qualifies under current wage transparency law
The law may be evolving, but that doesn’t mean your rights are gone. Employers are still legally required to post salary ranges and you could still be entitled to compensation for violations. Because transparency isn’t just about salary ranges — it’s about respect, fairness, and holding employers accountable.
Whether you’ve been injured on the job, subjected to mistreatment in the workplace, or affected by a privacy breach, our expert attorneys are here to help.
"Very friendly interview and intake process. I was informed thoroughly about the processes in obtaining a lawyer and was given ample time to make a decision on representation. I’m thankful for everyone’s help and looking forward to working with this Firm on my worker’s compensation claim."
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.