Contact Us for a FREE Case Review.
No Fee Unless We Recover for You.
"*" indicates required fields
Automated license plate reader technology uses cameras, optical character recognition, and software to capture and store images of vehicle license plates. These systems can also log:
ALPR systems are increasingly used in shopping centers, parking garages, residential developments, and private commercial properties, often without drivers’ awareness.
California drivers may have legal rights following allegations that major retailers deployed automated license plate reader (ALPR) systems to collect and share vehicle location data with law enforcement networks without complying with California’s ALPR privacy laws.
Under California law, businesses using ALPR technology must maintain, implement, and disclose specific usage and privacy policies. When companies fail to meet these statutory requirements, drivers may have claims for privacy violations and unlawful data practices, even if no traditional data breach occurred.
According to recent allegations some companies have installed ALPR systems on their properties and collected license plate data from shoppers, employees, and visitors.
The alleged conduct includes claims that:
If proven, these practices may violate California law governing private use of surveillance technologies.
California strictly regulates ALPR technology through California Civil Code § 1798.90.51–1798.90.55.
Under the law, entities using ALPR systems must:
Failure to comply can expose organizations to statutory penalties, injunctive relief, and civil liability, regardless of whether a data breach occurred.
License plate data linked with location and timestamps can reveal:
Because this data can be used to reconstruct a person’s movements over time, California law treats ALPR information as particularly sensitive and worthy of heightened protection.
Drivers whose license plate data was collected, stored, or shared without proper safeguards may have claims under:
Importantly, affected drivers may not receive notice when ALPR policies are violated, making enforcement dependent on investigation and legal action.
Only if they comply with California law. ALPR use requires specific policies, disclosures, and safeguards. Collecting and sharing data without them may be unlawful.
No. These cases often involve improper data practices, not hacking. Companies can be liable simply for failing to follow ALPR statutes.
Consent is a key issue. Drivers typically do not affirmatively consent to ALPR tracking, which is why the law emphasizes transparency and policy compliance.
Most drivers would not know. ALPR sharing often occurs behind the scenes, which is why investigations and litigation are necessary.
Anyone who parked or drove through mall‑owned parking facilities in California where ALPR systems were in use during the relevant period may be affected.
Emery | Reddy, PC represents individuals in privacy, consumer protection, and unlawful data practice cases, including claims involving surveillance technology and statutory violations. Our firm is investigating whether companies failed to follow California’s ALPR laws, and whether drivers’ rights were violated as a result. If you believe your privacy rights may have been impacted by the use of license plate reader technology, we encourage you to reach out to Emery | Reddy to learn more.
A data breach occurs when sensitive or confidential information is accessed, stolen, or exposed without authorization. If you have been the victim of a data breach, contact Emery | Reddy today.
A document review is a comprehensive consultation and analysis of your document’s legal language, context, and impact on your worker’s rights as an employee of Washington state.
In today’s digital landscape, cyberattacks and data breaches have become alarmingly common, compromising the personal and financial information of millions of individuals.
Whether you’ve been injured on the job, subjected to mistreatment in the workplace, or affected by a privacy breach, our expert attorneys are here to help.